-
- Johann Steurer and Maria Wertli.
- Horten Zentrum für praxisorientierte Forschung und Wissenstransfer, Universität Zürich.
- Ther Umsch. 2014 Dec 1; 71 (12): 771-4.
AbstractIn earlier times physicians decided on their own which diagnostic tests and treatments the patient should undergo, receive and follow. At least, such physicians' behavior is described in the literature. In recent decades the pendulum moved in the other direction. Nowadays and deservedly so patients have to be actively involved in the process of decision-making. The old fashioned method of decision-making is called the paternalistic model and the modern one the participative model (shared decision making). A prerequisite for being actively involved in the decision process patients have to be informed about their health status and the consequences of different options and potential decisions. There is no plausible reason to question the values of the participative model, but patients also have a right to be not informed about things they do not want to know. Transparency is desirable, but transparency is not 'per se' a good thing only.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.