-
Comparative Study
The reliability and validity of the Geriatric Depression Rating Scale administered by telephone.
- W J Burke, W H Roccaforte, S P Wengel, D M Conley, and J F Potter.
- Creighton-Nebraska Department of Psychiatry, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, USA.
- J Am Geriatr Soc. 1995 Jun 1; 43 (6): 674-9.
ObjectiveTo evaluate prospectively the reliability and validity of the Geriatric Depression Scale administered by telephone (T-GDS) in patients undergoing outpatient comprehensive geriatric assessment.SubjectsA total of 101 geriatric patients were evaluated in a 1-year period at the outpatient Geriatric Assessment Center of the University of Nebraska Medical Center.MethodsThe 30-item GDS was completed by all patients on three occasions: by telephone several days before their assessment, face-to-face during their assessment visit, and several days later, again by phone. During their assessment, all patients were evaluated by one of three geriatric psychiatrists who were blind to all GDS results. The test-retest reliability of the T-GDS was measured by comparing the results of the two phone interviews. The construct validity of the T-GDS was estimated by comparing the results of the initial T-GDS to the GDS obtained during the comprehensive assessment. The criterion validity of the T-GDS was estimated by comparing the results of the T-GDS with the clinical diagnosis of depression assigned by the psychiatrists.ResultsThe individual items of the initial T-GDS showed substantial concordance with the second T-GDS (kappa range 0.35-0.75, mean = 0.52), and with the assessment GDS (kappa range 0.29-0.75, mean = 0.52). One item showed evidence of bias when comparing the two T-GDSs, and two items when comparing the initial T-GDS to the GDS done during the assessment. The mean number of symptomatic responses was not significantly different for the T-GDS versus assessment administration but did decline slightly when comparing the two T-GDSs. ROC curve analyses showed good agreement between the clinical diagnosis and the T-GDS.ConclusionThe GDS appears to maintain its reliability and validity when administered via telephone and thus may be useful for a variety of epidemiological and clinical purposes.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.