• R A Clark and A L Rosenbaum.
• Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, Los Angeles, USA.
• J AAPOS. 1999 Feb 1; 3 (1): 18-25.

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to determine the clinical setting where errors in measurements of muscle position during strabismus surgery made by the Scott curved ruler or by calipers become important and to characterize the magnitude of those errors.MethodsGeometric analysis was used to determine the measurement error between true arc lengths of 3.0 to 20.0 mm versus Scott curved ruler measurements and caliper measurements for axial lengths ranging from 18 to 30 mm.ResultsFor measurements less than 9.0 mm, neither the Scott curved ruler nor calipers had any clinically important measurement error for any axial length. For axial lengths substantially smaller than 21 mm or larger than 24 mm, the Scott curved ruler, although more accurate than calipers, caused clinically important measurement errors with arc length measurements as small as 12 mm in very small eyes and 14 mm in large eyes. For axial lengths of 30 mm or more, both calipers and the Scott curved ruler had similar accuracy for measuring long arc lengths.ConclusionsBoth the Scott curved ruler and calipers are accurate in measuring arc lengths 9.0 mm or less. For longer arc length measurements, accuracy becomes dependent on axial length. The Scott curved ruler, although substantially more accurate than calipers for most common axial lengths, can introduce clinically important measurement errors when measuring arc lengths as small as 12 mm. Axial length should be considered when measuring muscle position during strabismus surgery.

12 keywords...

hide…