• Gastrointest. Endosc. · Jan 2012

    The impact of video recording colonoscopy on adenoma detection rates.

    • Mohammad F Madhoun and William M Tierney.
    • Department of Internal Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
    • Gastrointest. Endosc. 2012 Jan 1; 75 (1): 127-33.

    BackgroundThe adenoma detection rate (ADR) is a quality benchmark for colonoscopy, influenced by several factors including bowel preparation, withdrawal time, and withdrawal technique.ObjectiveTo assess the impact of video recording of all colonoscopies on the ADR.DesignComparison of two cohorts of patients undergoing colonoscopy before and after implementation of video recording.SettingAcademic outpatient endoscopy facility.PatientsThis study involved asymptomatic, average-risk adults undergoing screening colonoscopy.InterventionVideo recording of all colonoscopy procedures. Polyp findings and withdrawal times were recorded for 208 consecutive screening colonoscopies. A policy of video recording all colonoscopies was implemented and announced to the staff. Data on another 213 screening colonoscopies were subsequently collected.Main Outcome MeasurementsAdenoma detection rate, withdrawal time, advanced polyp detection rate, hyperplastic polyp detection rate.ResultsAt least one adenoma was found in 38.5% of patients after video recording versus 33.7% before video recording (P = .31). There was a significant increase in the hyperplastic polyp detection rate (44.1% vs 34.6%; P = .046). Most endoscopists had a numerical increase in their ADRs, but only one was significant (57.7% vs 22.6%; P < .01). There were trends toward higher detection of adenomas of <5 mm (59.1% vs 52%; P = .23) and right-sided adenomas (40.2% vs 30.4%; P = .11) in the video recorded group.LimitationsNo randomization, confounding of intervention effects, and sample size limitations.ConclusionVideo recording of colonoscopies is associated with a nonsignificant increase in the ADR and a significant increase in the hyperplastic polyp detection rate. There may be a benefit of video recording for endoscopists with low ADRs.Copyright © 2012 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.