• Zentralbl Chir · Oct 2003

    Comparative Study

    [Standards of visceral organ procurement].

    • A Frilling.
    • Klinik für Allgemein- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45122 Essen. frilling@uni-essen.de
    • Zentralbl Chir. 2003 Oct 1; 128 (10): 804-15.

    AbstractDue to poor willingness in the population to donate organs and increasing number of patients on the waiting list for organ transplantation there is an imminent need on cadaveric organs. Although efforts have been to optimize the prerequisites for organ donation, less than 50% of possible organ harvesting procedures take place. In our country, only 13.1 organ donations .per 1 million inhabitants were realized in 2001. These data force the medical community to maximize the utility of the donor pool. A refined surgical technique, increased efficacy of solutions for graft conservation, an advanced perioperative management and new potent immunosuppressive drugs contributed to a post-transplant 1-year graft and patient survival of up to 80 to 90%. The quality of a graft has a significant impact on the outcome of transplantation. An optimal graft function will not only be achieved with an adequate surgical and preservation technique but also with an appropriate management of the brain-dead donor on the intensive care unit. Basic knowledge of brain death definition, insight into the organization of organ donation, management of the donor, and modern surgical harvesting techniques are presented.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…