• Maximilian J Johnston, John T Paige, Rajesh Aggarwal, Dimitrios Stefanidis, Shawn Tsuda, Ankur Khajuria, Sonal Arora, and Association for Surgical Education Simulation Committee.
• Imperial Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Room 5.03, 5th floor, Wright-Fleming Building, St Mary's Campus, Norfolk Place, London, W2 1PG, UK. Electronic address: m.johnston@imperial.ac.uk.
• Am. J. Surg. 2016 Jan 1; 211 (1): 214-25.

BackgroundKey research priorities for surgical simulation have been identified in recent years. The aim of this study was to establish the progress that has been made within each research priority and what still remains to be achieved.MethodsMembers of the Association for Surgical Education Simulation Committee conducted individualized literature reviews for each research priority that were brought together by an expert panel.ResultsExcellent progress has been made in the assessment of individual and teamwork skills in simulation. The best methods of feedback and debriefing have not yet been established. Progress in answering more complex questions related to competence and transfer of training is slower than other questions. A link between simulation training and patient outcomes remains elusive.ConclusionsProgress has been made in skills assessment, curricula development, debriefing and decision making in surgery. The impact of simulation training on patient outcomes represents the focus of simulation research in the years to come.Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

18 keywords...

hide…