• C Matthew Hawkins.
• Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia. Electronic address: matt.hawkins@emory.edu.
• J Am Coll Radiol. 2014 Dec 1; 11 (12 Pt A): 1121-5.

AbstractThe planning phases of quality improvement projects are commonly overlooked. Disorganized planning and implementation can escalate chaos, intensify resistance to change, and increase the likelihood of failure. Two important steps in the planning phase are (1) assessing local resources available to aid in the quality improvement project and (2) evaluating the culture in which the desired change is to be implemented. Assessing local resources includes identifying and engaging key stakeholders and evaluating if appropriate expertise is available for the scope of the project. This process also involves engaging informaticists and gathering available IT tools to plan and automate (to the extent possible) the data-gathering, analysis, and feedback steps. Culture in a department is influenced by the ability and willingness to manage resistance to change, build consensus, span boundaries between stakeholders, and become a learning organization. Allotting appropriate time to perform these preparatory steps will increase the odds of successfully performing a quality improvement project and implementing change.Copyright © 2014 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

14 keywords...

hide…