• Anesthesia and analgesia · Jun 1994

    Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial

    Spinal anesthesia with ropivacaine: a double-blind study on the efficacy and safety of 0.5% and 0.75% solutions in patients undergoing minor lower limb surgery.

    • J W van Kleef, B T Veering, and A G Burm.
    • Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Leiden, The Netherlands.
    • Anesth. Analg. 1994 Jun 1; 78 (6): 1125-30.

    AbstractThe purpose of this study was to determine the clinical efficacy and safety of ropivacaine as a local anesthetic for spinal anesthesia. Forty patients between the ages of 18 and 75 yr, scheduled for minor lower limb surgery, were studied. They were randomly allocated to receive either 3 mL glucose-free 0.5% (15 mg) or 0.75% (22.5 mg) ropivacaine in a double-blind fashion. The subarachnoid puncture was performed with a 26-gauge Quincke-point needle at the L3-4 interspace with the patients in the sitting position. The onset of analgesia to pinprick was similar with both concentrations. The median (range) upper level of analgesia obtained with the 0.5% solution was T11 (L4-T5) and was T10-11 (L4-T4) with the 0.75% solution. The duration of analgesia at T12 (P < 0.01) and the total duration of analgesia (P < 0.002) were longer in the 0.75% group. In addition, the area under the number of blocked segments versus time curve was larger with the 0.75% ropivacaine solution (P < 0.001). The incidence of complete motor block of the lower limbs was higher (P < 0.02) and the total duration of motor block longer (P < 0.002) in the 0.75% group. No unexpected adverse events were registered. We conclude that subarachnoid injection of glucose-free ropivacaine solutions results in a variable spread of analgesia, mostly accompanied by a good quality of motor block, in particular with the 0.75% solution.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.