• Daniela Ricci, Laura Cesarini, Domenico M M Romeo, Francesca Gallini, Francesca Serrao, Michela Groppo, Agnese De Carli, Francesco Cota, Domenico Lepore, Fernando Molle, Roberto Ratiglia, Maria Pia De Carolis, Fabio Mosca, Costantino Romagnoli, Francesco Guzzetta, Frances Cowan, Luca A Ramenghi, and Eugenio Mercuri.
• Catholic University, Pediatric Neurology Unit, Largo Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy.
• Pediatrics. 2008 Dec 1; 122 (6): e1193-8.

ObjectivesThe objectives of this study were to (1) assess visual function in low-risk preterm infants at 35 and 40 weeks' postmenstrual age, (2) compare preterm visual abilities at term-equivalent age with term-born infants, and (3) evaluate effects of preterm extrauterine life on early visual function.MethodsVisual function was assessed by using a validated test battery at 35 and 40 weeks' postmenstrual age in 109 low-risk preterm infants who were born at <31 weeks' gestation. The preterm findings were compared with data from term-born infants collected by using the same test protocol.ResultsAll preterm infants completed both assessments. The 35-week responses were generally less mature than those at 40 weeks. Preterm infants at both ages were significantly more mature than term-born infants for ocular movements and vertical and arc tracking and at 40 weeks for stripe discrimination. In contrast, tracking a colored stimulus, attention at distance, and stripe discrimination were more mature at term age (in both term-born and preterm infants) than at 35 weeks.ConclusionsOur findings provide data for visual function at 35 and 40 weeks' postmenstrual age in low-risk preterm infants. The results suggest that early extrauterine experience may accelerate the maturation of aspects of visual function related to ocular stability and tracking but does not seem to affect other aspects that may be more cortically mediated.

33 keywords...

hide…