-
Anasth Intensivther Notfallmed · Dec 1990
Review Comparative Study[Epidural conduction anesthesia versus general anesthesia. A critical evaluation of outcome studies using as examples cesarean section and patients with hip fractures].
- H A Adams and G Hempelmann.
- Abteilung für Anästhesiologie, Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen.
- Anasth Intensivther Notfallmed. 1990 Dec 1; 25 (6): 391-5.
AbstractIn the field of anaesthesiology, outcome studies are undertaken to investigate the influence of different anaesthetic techniques on the intra- and postoperative course of patients in special clinical situations. The design of these studies should follow high methodological standards. In the past, most studies were undertaken in patients during Caesarean section and in the treatment of hip fractures in the elderly. Up to now, results do not clearly indicate the use of certain techniques in concrete clinical situations. Decisions must be made in accordance with clinical aspects, individual experience and in cooperation with the patient and the surgeon.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*,_underline_or**bold**. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>and subscript<sub>text</sub>. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3., hyphens-or asterisks*. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com) - Images can be included with:
 - For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote..