• Cecile Baron, Jean-François Aubry, Mickael Tanter, Stephen Meairs, and Mathias Fink.
• Laboratoire Ondes et Acoustique, University Paris 7, INSERM, 10, rue Vauquelin, Paris 75005, France. norabelic@yahoo.fr
• Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009 Jul 1; 35 (7): 1148-58.

AbstractTwo clinical trials have used ultrasound to improve tPA thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke. The Combined Lysis of Thrombus in Brain Ischemia Using Transcranial Ultrasound and Systemic tPA (CLOTBUST) trial reported accelerated recanalisation of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) in patients with symptoms of MCA infarction, which were monitored with 2-MHz transcranial Doppler. In CLOTBUST, there was no increased bleeding as evidenced by cranial computed tomography. The Transcranial Low-Frequency Ultrasound-Mediated Thrombolysis in Brain Ischemia (TRUMBI) trial, which employed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before and after tPA thrombolysis, was discontinued prematurely because of an increased number of secondary hemorrhages, possibly related to the use of low frequency 300-kHz ultrasound. The purpose of our work is to help identify possible mechanisms of intracerebral hemorrhage resulting from sonothrombolysis by applying a simulation tool that estimates the pressure levels in the human brain that are produced with different sonothrombolysis devices. A simulation software based on a finite difference time domain (FDTD) three-dimensional (3D) scheme was developed to predict acoustic pressures in the brain. This tool numerically models the wave propagation through the skull and reproduces both ultrasound protocols of CLOTBUST and TRUMBI for analysis of the distribution of acoustic pressure in the brain during stroke treatment. For the simulated TRUMBI trial, we analyzed both a "high" and "low" hypothesis according to published parameters (for high and low amplitude excitations). For these hypotheses, the mean peak rarefactional pressures in the brain were 0.26 +/- 0.2 MPa (high hypothesis) and 0.06 +/- 0.05 MPa (low hypothesis), with maximal local values as high as 1.2 MPa (high hypothesis) and 0.27 MPa (low hypothesis) for configurations modelled in this study. The peak rarefactional pressure was thus higher than the inertial acoustic cavitation threshold in the presence of a standing wave in large areas of the brain, even outside the targeted clot. For the simulated CLOTBUST trial, the maximum peak negative pressure was less than 0.07 MPa. This simulated pressure is below the threshold for both inertial and stable acoustic cavitation but likewise lower than any acoustic pressure that has been reported as sufficient for effective sonothrombolysis. Simulating the pressure field of ultrasound protocols for clinical trials of sonothrombolysis may help explain mechanisms of adverse effects. Such simulations could prove useful in the initial design and optimization of future protocols for this promising therapy of ischemic stroke.

26 keywords...

hide…