• B E Northrup, A R Vaccaro, J E Rosen, R A Balderston, and J M Cotler.
• Department of Neurosurgery, Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
• Spine. 1995 Nov 15; 20 (22): 2449-53.

Study DesignThis study retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of 11 patients treated for a cervical spine injury with a tracheostomy placed before anterior cervical spine surgery.ObjectivesThe primary goal was to show that anterior cervical spine surgery in the setting of spinal cord injury is a viable option in patients with previous tracheostomy.Summary Of Background DataRespiratory failure after cervical cord injury commonly requires tracheostomy, possibly increasing the risk of soft tissue or bony infection in patients at high risk for morbidity after surgery. Although numerous studies have explored the risk of infection after tracheostomy or anterior cervical spine surgery, no study has been performed to explore the risk of infection in patients with previous tracheostomy at the time of anterior cervical spine surgery.MethodsA retrospective review of the clinical data of 1800 spinal cord injury patients seen from 1979 to the present at the Regional Spinal Cord Injury Center of the Delaware Valley of Thomas Jefferson University with affiliated institutions of Thomas Jefferson University Hospital and Magee Rehabilitation Hospital was performed. Eleven patients were found who had existing tracheostomy at the time of anterior cervical spine surgery. Clinical follow-up period averaged 28 months with a range of 6-51 months, and radiographic analysis averaged 7 months with a range of 1-51 months. Autogenous iliac crest graft was used in all patients, consisting of an intervertebral graft after a discectomy or a strut graft after a complete corpectomy. Anterior instrumentation was used in more than 50% of the patients.ResultsAfter all patient interviews and review of all radiographs for evidence of infection, no patient was noted to have evidence of a cervical soft tissue or bony infection after surgery. The tracheostomy complications were minor and resolved quickly.ConclusionsThe authors concluded that in patients with cervical cord damage resulting from nonpenetrating trauma, tracheostomy was not found to increase the risk of infection in subsequent anterior cervical surgery. Careful preparation of the skin and placement of the second surgical incision lateral to the tracheostomy site is recommended. Anterior cervical spine surgery remains a viable treatment option in this severely injured patient population.

19 keywords...

hide…