• Regional-Anaesthesie · Jul 1984

    Clinical Trial

    [0.5 mg intrathecal morphine in spinal anesthesia. A double blind study on sensory block, postoperative analgesia and adverse effects].

    • E Lanz, M Daubländer, M Lipp, and D Theiss.
    • Reg Anaesth. 1984 Jul 1; 7 (3): 79-85.

    AbstractIn a randomized double-blind study the influence of morphine 0.5 mg on the development and regression of spinal anaesthesia, the postoperative analgesia and the side effects were investigated. Forty-two patients received an isobaric spinal anaesthesia with tetracaine 20 mg without morphine (n = 19) or with morphine 0.5 mg (n = 23). The sensory blockade was tested by pinprick; the patients evaluated their postoperative pain with an analogue scale. Arterial blood gases, respiratory rate, blood pressure and heart rate were measured and side effects determined. In the test group the cranial level of anaesthesia was during the development (p greater than 0.05) and regression (p less than 0.05) half to three segments higher than in the control group. The postoperative analgesia was more intense and longer lasting with morphine than without (p less than 0.05). Following morphine, P art CO2 was higher (p less than 0.05), the respiratory rate lower (p less than 0.05). Pruritus, nausea, vomiting and disturbances of micturition were more frequent. Following spinal anaesthesia with a deeper level of anaesthesia at T8-T11 the postoperative analgesia was superior than following spinal anaesthesia with a higher level of anaesthesia at T3-T4 (p less than 0.05). Only following higher levels of anaesthesia there was evidence of respiratory depression (p less than 0.05). This is why the level of spinal anaesthesia with the addition of morphine must not be higher than necessary for surgery.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.