• J. Vasc. Surg. · Nov 2010

    Comparative Study

    Laparoscopic versus open celiac ganglionectomy in patients with median arcuate ligament syndrome.

    • Allan W Tulloch, Juan Carlos Jimenez, Peter F Lawrence, Erik P Dutson, Wesley S Moore, David A Rigberg, Brian G Derubertis, and William J Quinones-Baldrich.
    • Division of Vascular Surgery, University of California-Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
    • J. Vasc. Surg. 2010 Nov 1; 52 (5): 1283-9.

    ObjectiveMedian arcuate ligament syndrome (MALS) is a rare disorder characterized by abdominal pain and compression of the celiac artery. Traditional management consists of open MAL division, with or without arterial reconstruction. We present our outcomes using a laparoscopic approach and compare them to patients treated with open MAL division during the same period.MethodsA retrospective medical records review of all patients with MALS treated at the University of California-Los Angeles from January 1999 to 2009 was performed.ResultsFourteen patients with MALS were treated. All patients underwent an extensive preoperative gastrointestinal (GI) workup with 10 undergoing attempted laparoscopic division of the MAL and celiac ganglion (laparoscopic ganglionectomy [LG]). Two intraoperative conversions were performed for bleeding. Six patients were treated in the open surgery group (open ganglionectomy [OG]). There were no deaths or reoperations in either group. Median time to feeding was 1.0 vs 2.8 days (P≤.05) in the LG and OG groups, respectively, which was statistically significant. Median length of hospitalization was also significantly lower in the LG group compared with the OG group (2.3 vs 7.0 days; P≤.05). Eight patients had LG (100%) and 5 patients had OG (83%) and had immediate symptom resolution (postoperative day 1). Three patients with recurrent symptoms after LG underwent angiography demonstrating persistent celiac stenosis, then an angioplasty was performed. Median follow-up was 14.0 months (2-65 months) for all patients. Three patients who received LG (38%) and 3 patients who received OG (50%) had persistent pain at last follow-up. Six patients in the OG group (100%) and 7 patients in the LG group (88%) had ceased taking chronic oral narcotics at their last follow-up visit.ConclusionBoth laparoscopic and open MAL division and celiac ganglionectomy can be safely performed with minimal patient morbidity and mortality. Late recurrence is frequently seen; however, this seems to be milder than the presenting symptoms. The laparoscopic approach results in avoidance of laparotomy and was associated with shorter inpatient hospitalization and decreased time to feeding in our study. Optimal patient selection and prediction of clinical response in these patients remains a challenge.Copyright © 2010 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…