• Am. J. Clin. Nutr. · Jan 2016

    Vegetable and fruit consumption and the risk of hormone receptor-defined breast cancer in the EPIC cohort.

    • Marleen J Emaus, Petra H M Peeters, Marije F Bakker, Kim Overvad, Anne Tjønneland, Anja Olsen, Isabelle Romieu, Pietro Ferrari, Laure Dossus, Marie Christine Boutron-Ruault, Laura Baglietto, Renée T Fortner, Rudolf Kaaks, Heiner Boeing, Antonia Trichopoulou, Pagona Lagiou, Dimitrios Trichopoulos, Giovanna Masala, Valeria Pala, Salvatore Panico, Rosario Tumino, Silvia Polidoro, Guri Skeie, Eiliv Lund, Elisabete Weiderpass, J Ramón Quirós, Noémie Travier, María-José Sánchez, Maria-Dolores Chirlaque, Eva Ardanaz, Miren Dorronsoro, Anna Winkvist, Maria Wennberg, H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita, Kay-Tee Khaw, Ruth C Travis, Timothy J Key, Dagfinn Aune, Marc Gunter, Elio Riboli, and Carla H van Gils.
    • Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands;
    • Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2016 Jan 1; 103 (1): 168-77.

    BackgroundThe recent literature indicates that a high vegetable intake and not a high fruit intake could be associated with decreased steroid hormone receptor-negative breast cancer risk.ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate the association between vegetable and fruit intake and steroid hormone receptor-defined breast cancer risk.DesignA total of 335,054 female participants in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort were included in this study (mean ± SD age: 50.8 ± 9.8 y). Vegetable and fruit intake was measured by country-specific questionnaires filled out at recruitment between 1992 and 2000 with the use of standardized procedures. Cox proportional hazards models were stratified by age at recruitment and study center and were adjusted for breast cancer risk factors.ResultsAfter a median follow-up of 11.5 y (IQR: 10.1-12.3 y), 10,197 incident invasive breast cancers were diagnosed [3479 estrogen and progesterone receptor positive (ER+PR+); 1021 ER and PR negative (ER-PR-)]. Compared with the lowest quintile, the highest quintile of vegetable intake was associated with a lower risk of overall breast cancer (HRquintile 5-quintile 1: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.80, 0.94). Although the inverse association was most apparent for ER-PR- breast cancer (ER-PR-: HRquintile 5-quintile 1: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.57, 0.96; P-trend = 0.03; ER+PR+: HRquintile 5-quintile 1: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.79, 1.05; P-trend = 0.14), the test for heterogeneity by hormone receptor status was not significant (P-heterogeneity = 0.09). Fruit intake was not significantly associated with total and hormone receptor-defined breast cancer risk.ConclusionThis study supports evidence that a high vegetable intake is associated with lower (mainly hormone receptor-negative) breast cancer risk.© 2016 American Society for Nutrition.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…