• Oliver Bandschapp, Matthew T Sweney, Judy A Miller, Samira Tahvildari, Daniel C Sigg, and Paul A Iaizzo.
• 1 Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota , Minneapolis, Minnesota.
• Ther Hypothermia Temp Manag. 2011 Jan 1; 1 (4): 193-8.

AbstractThe induction of mild hypothermia has been considered as an important means to provide protection against cerebral ischemia. Yet, to date, the relative clinical efficacies of different noninvasive methods for reducing core body temperature have not been thoroughly studied. The aim of the current investigation was to compare the relative effectiveness of several noninvasive cooling techniques for reducing core temperatures in healthy volunteers. Cooling methods included convective/conductive and evaporative/conductive combinations, as well as evaporative cooling alone. Additionally, focal facial warming was employed as a means to suppress involuntary motor activity and thus better enable noninvasive cooling. Core temperatures were measured so to monitor the relative efficiencies of these induced cooling methodologies. With each employed methodology, rectal temperature reductions were induced, with combined evaporative/conductive (n=4, 1.44°C±0.99°C) and convective/conductive (n=4, 1.51°C±0.89°C) approaches yielding the largest decreases: note, that evaporative cooling alone was not as efficient in lowering core body temperature (n=10, 0.56°C±0.20°C; n=16, 0.58°C±0.27°C). In this study on healthy volunteers, the evaporative/conductive and convective/conductive combination methods were more effective in reducing core temperatures as compared with an evaporative approach alone. These therapeutic approaches for the induction of mild hypothermia (including the use of facial warming) could be employed in warranted clinical cases, importantly without the need for administration of anesthetics or paralytics.

5 keywords...

hide…