-
- K Field and D J Murphy.
- Academic Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Trinity College, University of Dublin & Coombe Women & Infants University Hospital, Cork Street, Dublin 8, Republic of Ireland fieldk@tcd.ie.
- Hum. Reprod. 2015 May 1; 30 (5): 1239-45.
Study QuestionIs a history of three or more miscarriages associated with adverse perinatal outcomes in a subsequent pregnancy?Summary AnswerRecurrent miscarriage is associated with an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes, including preterm birth, very preterm birth and perinatal death, in a subsequent pregnancy.What Is Known AlreadyPublished data are conflicting with some studies reporting an increase in adverse perinatal outcomes in association with prior recurrent miscarriage while others report little or no increase. Large-scale population-based studies have been lacking.Study Design, Size, DurationWe performed a retrospective cohort study of 30 053 women with a singleton pregnancy who booked for antenatal care and delivery between January 2008 and July 2011.Participants/Materials, Setting, MethodsAll women who attended a university affiliated hospital in Ireland had a detailed obstetric history taken, recording the outcome of all previous pregnancies. We compared the obstetric and perinatal outcomes of 2030 women (6.8%) who had a history of three or more miscarriages (recurrent miscarriage) with the outcomes of 28 023 women (93.2%) who did not. Logistic regression analyses were performed, adjusting for potential confounding factors.Main Results And The Role Of ChanceWomen with a history of recurrent miscarriage were more likely to be obese, to have undergone assisted conception, to have had a previous perinatal death, and to be delivered by scheduled Caesarean section. Recurrent miscarriage was associated with an increased incidence of preterm birth (<37 weeks gestation, 8.1 versus 5.5%, adjOR 1.54; 95% CI 1.29-1.84), very preterm birth (<32 weeks gestation, 2.2 versus 1.2%, adjOR 1.80; 95% CI 1.28-2.53), and perinatal death (1.2 versus 0.5%, adjOR 2.66; 95% CI 1.70-4.14). The results were similar for both primary and secondary recurrent miscarriage.Limitations, Reasons For CautionThis is a retrospective cohort study and while regression analyses adjusted for potential confounding factors, residual confounding may persist. The strict definition of recurrent miscarriage is three consecutive miscarriages and while each woman in the study group had three or more miscarriages, they were only confirmed to be consecutive in the primary RM group. The affected women have not been categorized according to aetiology of recurrent miscarriage and it may be that adverse outcomes differ according to aetiological subgroup.Wider Implications Of The FindingsThis study highlights the need for specialist obstetric care for women who have had three or more previous miscarriages, particularly in relation to the risk of preterm delivery.Study Funding/Competing InterestsThere was no specific funding obtained for this study and there are no conflict of interests.© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.