• Andrew F Shorr, Ying P Tabak, Richard S Johannes, Xiaowu Sun, James Spalding, and Marin H Kollef.
• Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Service, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC 20010, USA. afshorr@dnamail.com
• Crit Care. 2009 Jan 1; 13 (5): R156.

IntroductionCandidemia results in substantial morbidity and mortality, especially if initial antifungal therapy is delayed or is inappropriate; however, candidemia is difficult to diagnose because of its nonspecific presentation.MethodsTo develop a risk score for identifying hospitalized patients with candidemia, we performed a retrospective analysis of a large database of 176 acute-care hospitals in the United States. We studied 64,019 patients with bloodstream infection (BSI) on presentation from 2000 through 2005 (derivation cohort) and 24,685 from 2006 to 2007 (validation cohort). We used recursive partitioning (RPART) to identify the best discriminators for Candida as the cause of BSI. We compared three sets of models (equal-weight, unequal-weight, vs full model with additional variables from logistic regression model) for sensitivity analysis.ResultsThe RPART identified 6 variables as the best discriminators: age < 65 years, temperature 0.10, indicating predicted and observed candidemia rates did not differ significant across the 7 risk stratus). The full model with 16 risk factors had slightly higher AUROCs (0.74 versus 0.73 for derivation versus validation); however, 7 variables were no longer significant in the recalibrated model for the validation cohort, indicating that the additional items did not materially enhance the model.ConclusionsA simple equal-weight risk score differentiated patients' risk for candidemia in a graded fashion upon hospital presentation.

18 keywords...

hide…