-
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. · Jun 1980
Comparative StudyAggressive management of potential penetrating cardiac injuries.
- V A DeGennaro, E A Bonfils-Roberts, N Ching, and T F Nealon.
- J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1980 Jun 1; 79 (6): 833-7.
AbstractSince 1970 all patients admitted with penetrating injuries near the cardiac silhouette are transferred immediately to the operating room for resuscitation and evaluation for immediate thoracotomy. The clinical courses of 10 patients with penetrating cardiac injuries treated between 1962 and 1969 were analyzed and compared with those of 33 patients who presented between 1970 and 1977 and were managed more aggressively. Since the institution of this more aggressive policy, overall survival has improved from 20% to 67%. In patients arriving in the emergency room with signs of viability, survival increased from 29% to 76%. Of 53 patients with injuries in the area of the cardiac silhouette, 33 (62%) actually sustained cardiac injury. The high probability of cardiac injury in patients with external wounds in the silhouette and the improved survival rate seen with aggressive surgical therapy justifies the change to this policy.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.