• Emre Gorgun, Cigdem Benlice, Elizabeth Corrao, Jeff Hammel, Ozgen Isik, Tracy Hull, and Feza H Remzi.
• Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH. Electronic address: gorgune@ccf.org.
• Surgery. 2014 Oct 1; 156 (4): 825-32.

PurposeThe aim of this study is to determine if resident involvement in a large cohort of laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCS) cases negatively impacts outcomes and ultimately increases costs.MethodsThe American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for patients who underwent LCS between 2005 and 2010. Patients were classified into two groups: postgraduate year (PGY; resident involvement) or Attending Only. A subgroup analysis was then conducted among the individual PGY levels (1-2, 3-5, ≥6) and Attending Only group.ResultsA total of 4,836 patients were included in the PGY group and 2,418 in the Attending Only group. Mean operative time (163.9 ± 66.7 vs. 140.7 ± 67.2 minutes, P < .001) and length of hospital stay (5.8 ± 5.4 vs. 5.6 ± 5.4 days, P = .015) were significantly longer in the PGY group. Surgical and nonsurgical complications and overall morbidity and mortality rates were similar between the two groups. Each individual PGY group was associated with longer operative time (P < .001), and PGY ≥ 6 was associated with an increased length of stay (P < .001).ConclusionAlthough resident participation in LCS does not affect overall mortality or morbidity, it may negatively impact hospital costs through increased operative time and length of hospital stay. Early and intensive laparoscopy training may be necessary for improving residents' laparoscopy skills before their involvement in LCS.Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

31 keywords...

hide…