• Can J Anaesth · Sep 2013

    The Revised Cardiac Risk Index in the new millennium: a single-centre prospective cohort re-evaluation of the original variables in 9,519 consecutive elective surgical patients.

    • Christopher Davis, Gordon Tait, Jo Carroll, Duminda N Wijeysundera, and W Scott Beattie.
    • Department of Anesthesia, University of Toronto and the Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
    • Can J Anaesth. 2013 Sep 1; 60 (9): 855-63.

    PurposeCardiac complications following non-cardiac surgery are major causes of morbidity and mortality. The Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) has become a standard for predicting post-surgical cardiac complications. This study re-examined the original six risk factors to confirm their validity in a large modern prospective database.MethodsUsing the definitions in the original risk index, this study included 9,519 patients aged ≥ 50 undergoing elective non-cardiac surgery with an expected length of stay ≥ two days at two major tertiary-care teaching hospitals. The validity of the original predictors was tested in this population using binomial logistic regression modelling, area under the receiver operator curve (ROC) analysis, and the net reclassification index.ResultsRates of major cardiac complications with 0, 1, 2, ≥ 3 of the predictors were 0.5%, 2.6%, 7.2%, and 14.4%, respectively, in our patient cohort compared with 0.4%, 1.1%, 4.6%, and 9.7%, respectively, in the original cohort. Similar to the original report, binary logistic regression analysis showed that both preoperative treatment with insulin (odds ratio [OR] 1.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.7 to 2.6) and preoperative creatinine > 176.8 mmol·L(-1) (OR 1.7; 95% CI 0.8 to 3.6) did not improve the predictive ability of the index. Analysis of the remaining four factors resulted in an area under the curve (AUC) identical to that seen for the reconstructed six-factor RCRI (AUC = 0.79). We found that a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 30 mL·min(-1) was a better predictor of major cardiac complications (OR 2.2; 95% CI 1.2 to 4.3) than creatinine > 176.8 mmol·L(-1). The receiver operating characteristic analysis of this resultant 5-Factor model resulted in an AUC of 0.79, with 0, 1, 2, ≥ 3 of the predictors representing 0.5%, 2.9%, 7.4%, and 17.0% risk, respectively, among our patient cohort.ConclusionCompared with the RCRI, a simplified 5-Factor model using a high-risk type of surgery, a history of ischemic heart disease, congestive heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, and a preoperative GFR < 30 mL·min(-1) results in superior prediction of major cardiac complications following elective non-cardiac surgery.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…