• J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis · May 2014

    Comparative Study

    Does modern ischemic stroke therapy in a large community-based dedicated stroke center improve clinical outcomes? A two-year retrospective study.

    • Matthew H Berlet, Glenn W Stambo, Merle Kelley, Kelly Van Epps, Troy Woeste, and Diana Steffen.
    • Department of Neurointerventional Radiology and Neuroscience Center, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Tampa, Florida. Electronic address: mberlet@tampabay.rr.com.
    • J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014 May 1; 23 (5): 869-78.

    BackgroundTo compare modern endovascular therapies in the acute ischemic stroke patients leading to more comprehensive acute stroke algorithm.MethodsA 2-year retrospective nonrandomized study on 76 patients who were placed into 5 different treatment groups for acute ischemic stroke. These groups included: group 1 (no treatment) (n = 24), group 2 (intravenous tissue plasminogen activator [tPA] only) (n = 18), group 3 (intra-arterial [IA] tPA) (n = 9), group 4 (Mechanical Embolus Removal in Cerebral Ischemia [MERCI]; retrieval only) (n = 17), and group 5 (combined IA/MERCI) (n = 8). Age range for all groups was 29-92 years. There were 39 women (51.3%) and 37 men (48.7%). The mean age for all patients was 70.1 years. The pre- and post-National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) values were obtained for each group on arrival and discharge from the hospital. The results of the 4 treatment cohorts were compared with the no treatment group, providing the relative efficacy of these procedures compared with conservative medical therapy alone.ResultsGroup 1 presented with an admission NIHSS value of 11.1 and 8.9 on discharge from the hospital. There was a NIHSS reduction of 2.2 without treatment. Group 2 had an admission NIHSS value of 11.8 and a discharge value of 4.7, resulting in an NIHSS reduction of 7.1. Group 3 had an admission NIHSS value of 16.1 and 7.4 at discharge, resulting in an NIHSS reduction of 8.7. Group 4 had an admission NIHSS value of 15.9 and discharge NIHSS value of 3.1, with an NIHSS reduction of 12.8. Group 5 had an admission NIHSS score of 15.7 and 10.6 at discharge, with an NIHSS reduction of 5.1. Four patients expired during their admission, 2 from group 1 (control group) and 2 from group 5 (combined IA/MERCI group). There was a statistically significant difference for the 5 groups at the P < .05 level in change in NIHSS scores: F (4, 24) = 9.10, P = .000.ConclusionsModern endovascular therapies for acute ischemic stroke do improve clinical outcomes when implemented in the setting of a dedicated comprehensive stroke team.Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Inc.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…