• Neurosurgery · Dec 2016

    Diagnostic Value of Fractal Analysis for the Differentiation of Brain Tumors Using 3-Tesla Magnetic Resonance Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging.

    • Antonio Di Ieva, Pierre-Jean Le Reste, Béatrice Carsin-Nicol, Jean-Christophe Ferre, and Michael D Cusimano.
    • ‡Australian School of Advanced Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, Macquarie University Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; §Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; ¶Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Pontchaillou, Rennes, France; ‖Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Pontchaillou, Rennes, France; #Division of Neurosurgery, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
    • Neurosurgery. 2016 Dec 1; 79 (6): 839-846.

    BackgroundSusceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) of brain tumors provides information about neoplastic vasculature and intratumoral micro- and macrobleedings. Low- and high-grade gliomas can be distinguished by SWI due to their different vascular characteristics. Fractal analysis allows for quantification of these radiological differences by a computer-based morphological assessment of SWI patterns.ObjectiveTo show the feasibility of SWI analysis on 3-T magnetic resonance imaging to distinguish different kinds of brain tumors.MethodsSeventy-eight patients affected by brain tumors of different histopathology (low- and high-grade gliomas, metastases, meningiomas, lymphomas) were included. All patients underwent preoperative 3-T magnetic resonance imaging including SWI, on which the lesions were contoured. The images underwent automated computation, extracting 2 quantitative parameters: the volume fraction of SWI signals within the tumors (signal ratio) and the morphological self-similar features (fractal dimension [FD]). The results were then correlated with each histopathological type of tumor.ResultsSignal ratio and FD were able to differentiate low-grade gliomas from grade III and IV gliomas, metastases, and meningiomas (P < .05). FD was statistically different between lymphomas and high-grade gliomas (P < .05). A receiver-operating characteristic analysis showed that the optimal cutoff value for differentiating low- from high-grade gliomas was 1.75 for FD (sensitivity, 81%; specificity, 89%) and 0.03 for signal ratio (sensitivity, 80%; specificity, 86%).ConclusionFD of SWI on 3-T magnetic resonance imaging is a novel image biomarker for glioma grading and brain tumor characterization. Computational models offer promising results that may improve diagnosis and open perspectives in the radiological assessment of brain tumors.AbbreviationsFD, fractal dimensionSR, signal ratioSWI, susceptibility-weighted imaging.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…