• A Amann, U Achleitner, H Antretter, J O Bonatti, A C Krismer, K H Lindner, J Rieder, V Wenzel, W G Voelckel, and H U Strohmenger.
• Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, The Leopold-Franzens University, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
• Resuscitation. 2001 Jul 1; 50 (1): 77-85.

AbstractMean fibrillation frequency may predict defibrillation success during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). N(alpha)-histogram analysis should be investigated as an alternative. After 4 min of cardiac arrest, and 3 versus 8 min of CPR, 25 pigs received either vasopressin or epinephrine (0.4, 0.4, and 0.8 U/kg vasopressin versus 45, 45, and 200 microg/kg epinephrine) every 5 min with defibrillation at 22 min. Before defibrillation, the N(alpha)-parameter histogramstart/histogramwidth and the mean fibrillation frequency in resuscitated versus non-resuscitated pigs were 2.9+/-0.4 versus 1.7+/-0.5 (P=0.0000005); and 9.5+/-1.7 versus 6.9+/-0.7 (P=0.0003). During the last minute prior to defibrillation, histogramstart/histogramwidth of > or =2.3 versus mean fibrillation frequency > or =8 Hz predicted successful defibrillation with subsequent return of a spontaneous circulation for more than 60 min with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 94 versus 82%, 96 versus 89%, 98 versus 93% and 90 versus 74%, respectively. We conclude, that N(alpha)-analysis was superior to mean fibrillation frequency analysis during CPR in predicting defibrillation success, and distinction between vasopressin versus epinephrine effects.

25 keywords...

hide…