• Acta Ophthalmol Scand · Jun 1999

    Comparative Study

    Intraocular foreign bodies. Factors influencing final visual outcome.

    • C Chiquet, J C Zech, P Denis, P Adeleine, and C Trepsat.
    • Department of Ophthalmology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France.
    • Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1999 Jun 1; 77 (3): 321-5.

    PurposeTo identify the prognostic factors of poor visual outcome (visual acuity < or =6/240) in eyes with intraocular foreign bodies.MethodsThe records of 95 consecutive patients were retrospectively reviewed for 6 years (1990-1995). All eyes underwent a primary surgical repair and foreign-body removal (electromagnet or vitrectomy). The mean follow-up period was 25 months (6-72 months). Single analysis and multiple logistic stepwise regression analysis were performed to determine predictors of poor vision.ResultsThirty patients (31.6%) showed 6/240 or worse vision at the end of their follow-up period. Three significant predictive factors had independent and combined effects on post-operative visual outcome: a corneo-scleral entry wound (odds ratio (OR)=14.5, p=0.001), largest diameter of IOFB (OR=1.21, p=0.01) and the presence of secondary retinal detachment (OR=9.48, p=0.0002). Post-operative complications included traumatic cataracts (51%), retinal detachments (28%) and phthisis bulbi (8%).ConclusionUsing multivariate analysis, corneo-scleral entry wound, largest diameter of foreign body and secondary retinal detachment were found to be predictors of poor visual outcome after intraocular foreign body removal. Our results suggest that patients with high-risk intraocular foreign body trauma should be candidates for pars plana vitrectomy rather than electromagnet procedure.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…