• J Daley and L Forrow.
• Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
• Prim. Care. 1992 Mar 1; 19 (1): 203-16.

AbstractThe HIV virus and the associated worldwide pandemic pose enormous biomedical, clinical, and social dilemmas for health care providers, biomedical researchers, policy analysts, and the public at large 10 years after its discovery. Many of these dilemmas and challenges are captured in the difficult ethical issues the HIV epidemic has highlighted for primary care physicians. Given the vanishingly small risk to primary care providers of acquiring HIV infection in office practice and the rapidly increasing prevalence of the virus, a clear ethical obligation to care for HIV-infected patients exists for primary care physicians. Primary care providers should be sensitive to the potentially sensitive nature of patient risk status and HIV testing results and balance confidentiality in the medical record with the "need to know" the patient's clinical status by other health care professionals. Every attempt should be made by the primary care provider to encourage HIV-infected patients to act responsibly toward their intimate sexual partners and inform them of their HIV status to take appropriate precautions against acquiring the virus. Primary care providers should also model responsible shared decision making and goal setting with HIV-infected patients early in the course of the disease, laying the foundation for subsequent decision making later in the course of the illness. Finally, considerable controversy exists about the responsibilities of HIV-infected providers to inform patients of their status; professional and public policy in this area is in rapid flux. Undoubtedly, the HIV epidemic will continue to challenge us and force careful examination of many of the critical dilemmas in modern biomedical ethics.

19 keywords...

hide…