• Spine J · Sep 2014

    Evaluation of resorption and biocompatibility of collagen hemostats in the spinal epidural space.

    • Kentaro Mizuno, Takumi Ikeda, Kazuya Ikoma, Hidenobu Ishibashi, Hitoshi Tonomura, Masateru Nagae, Yuji Arai, Hiroyoshi Fujiwara, Yasuo Mikami, and Toshikazu Kubo.
    • Department of Orthopaedics, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kawaramachi-Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto 602-8566, Japan.
    • Spine J. 2014 Sep 1; 14 (9): 2141-9.

    Background ContextCollagen hemostats have different characteristics depending on their properties and configuration. In vivo serial evaluation of local reactions because of placement of hemostats in the epidural space has not been reported.PurposeThis study compared the resorption and biocompatibility of two types of collagen hemostats placed in the epidural space.Study DesignThis in vivo study used experimental animals to evaluate collagen hemostats that were placed in the epidural space.MethodsA ligamentum flavum resection model was created in Japanese white rabbits (n=65). A microfibrillar collagen hemostat (MCH group, n=5), cotton-type collagen hemostat (CCH group, n=5) that was chemically cross-linked, or no hemostat (control group, n=4) was placed in the spinal epidural space. For histologic evaluation, each group was euthanized 1, 2, 4, and 8 weeks postoperatively (PO), and hematoxylin-eosin and immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for inflammatory cytokines (tumor necrosis factor [TNF]-α, interleukin [IL]-6), cyclooxygenase (COX)-2, and macrophages (CD68) was performed. To evaluate exudate accumulation and the degree of inflammation in the epidural space, magnetic resonance imaging at 7.04 T was serially performed in each group (n=3) under anesthesia and sedation.ResultsThe collagen hemostats in both groups were reabsorbed at 4 weeks PO. In the MCH group, there was inflammatory cell infiltration and granuloma formation around the hemostat, TNF-α-positive cells were seen up to 1 week, and IL-6-, COX-2-, and CD68-positive cells were seen at all evaluation times. In the CCH group, no inflammatory cell infiltration around the hemostat was observed, and IHC staining showed no positive cells at 4 weeks PO and later. T2*-weighted MR images showed significantly higher mean signal intensity of the epidural space in the MCH group than in the CCH group but only at 1 week PO (p<.05).ConclusionsResorption of both hemostats was similar. In the MCH group, there was intense tissue inflammation around the hemostatic material, and MR images showed high signal intensity because of exudate accumulation in the epidural space. This indicated a strong foreign-body reaction to the MCH, thus demonstrating a difference in biocompatibility with the CCH.Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…