• M Aomar Millán, M Cortiñas Sáenz, J Delgado Tapia, M Gerónimo Pardo, V Calatayud Pérez, and R Peyró García.
• Servicio de Anestesiología y Reanimación, Hospital de Coslada, Madrid.
• Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2011 Dec 1; 58 (10): 583-8.

Background And ObjectiveMethylprednisolone was used to improve neurologic recovery from spinal cord injury in the National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Studies (NASCIS). Debate over this use led to further research and a 2002 report stating that there was insufficient evidence to support this application as a standard therapy. Our aim was to retrospectively assess this application in a cohort of patients with spinal cord injury.MethodsRetrospective cohort study of patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) between 1997 and 2007 with a diagnosis of spinal cord injury due to trauma. The patients were grouped according to medical treatment received into a methylprednisolone group and a no-methylprednisolone group. We assessed change in neurologic function on the impairment scale of the American Spinal Injury Association on ICU admission and on discharge. We also recorded medical complications in each group. Cox multiple regression analysis was used to analyze differences between treatments.ResultsNo significant differences were detected in neurologic outcome on discharge from the ICU (odds ratio [OR], 1.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69-3.54). The methylprednisolone-treated patients had more medical complications such as hyperglycemia (OR, 5.67; 95% CI, 1.85-17.31) or gastrointestinal bleeding (OR, 19.16; 95% CI, 1.64-223.30) than the patients who did not receive methylprednisolone.ConclusionsIn this retrospective study, methylprednisolone was unrelated to improvement in neurologic outcome after acute spinal cord injury on ICU discharge although the patients treated with this drug were at greater risk of metabolic complications.

15 keywords...

hide…