• Fergal Glynn, Mohamed Amin, and John Kinsella.
• Department of Paediatric Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Adelaide/Meath Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. fglynn@rcsi.ie
• Pediatr Emerg Care. 2008 Apr 1; 24 (4): 217-8.

ObjectivesPrimary ObjectiveTo determine the proportion of children with nasal foreign bodies who had button batteries as the foreign body.Secondary ObjectiveTo describe the clinical care and outcome of those children with a button battery foreign body.MethodsA retrospective review of all children presenting to the accident and emergency room with a nasal foreign body or unilateral nasal discharge during a 6-month period was assessed.ResultsForty-four children were included. The most common object found was a plastic bead (27%), followed by foam, paper, or tissue fragments (23%); food matter represented 15%. A button battery was found in 3 patients (7%); other foreign bodies included stones, buttons, crayons, erasers, and a pellet. Thiry-six (82%) had their foreign body removed without anesthetic and 8 (18%) required a general anesthetic. All 3 children with a button battery went undiagnosed until examination in the operating theater. Because there was no previous indication of the presence of a button battery in the 3 children, the removal of the foreign body under general anesthesia was scheduled for the following day.ConclusionsThe removal of the button batteries would have been expedited had a plain radiograph been obtained, possibly resulting in less morbidity for our patients. We recommend a plain radiograph in all children presenting with a nonvisible foreign body or unilateral nasal discharge.

15 keywords...

hide…