-
J. Antimicrob. Chemother. · Jul 2004
Review Meta Analysis Comparative StudyOral versus intravenous antibiotic treatment for febrile neutropenia in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.
- Liat Vidal, Mical Paul, Itsik Ben dor, Karla Soares-Weiser, and Leonard Leibovici.
- Department of Medicine E, Beilinson Campus, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tiqva 49100. liatvidal@hotmail.com
- J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2004 Jul 1; 54 (1): 29-37.
ContextNeutropenia is one of the grave consequences of cancer chemotherapy, and the treatment of neutropenic febrile patients with intravenous (iv) antibiotics has been shown to reduce mortality. Oral therapy could be an alternative approach for selected patients.ObjectivesTo compare the efficacy of oral antibiotics versus iv antibiotic therapy in febrile neutropenic cancer patients.Data SourcesThe Cochrane Library, the Cochrane Cancer Network Register of trials, EMBASE, LILACS and MEDLINE, databases for ongoing trials and the conference proceedings of the Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC).Study SelectionRandomized controlled trials comparing oral antibiotic/s and iv antibiotic/s for the treatment of neutropenic cancer patients with fever.Data CollectionTwo reviewers independently assessed trial eligibility, methodological quality and extracted all data. Data concerning mortality, treatment failures and adverse events were drawn from included studies assuming an 'intention-to-treat' and 'per-protocol' basis for the outcome measures whenever possible. Relative risks (RR) with their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous data were estimated.Main ResultsFifteen trials (median mortality 0, range 0%-8.8%) were included in the analyses. The mortality rate was similar comparing oral and iv antibiotic treatment (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.49-1.41, 2224 patients). Treatment failure rates were also similar (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.84-1.05, 15 trials). No significant heterogeneity was shown for the primary outcomes. This effect was stable in a wide range of patients. Quinolones alone or combined with other antibiotics were used with comparable results. Adverse reactions, mostly gastrointestinal, were more common with oral antibiotics.ConclusionsOral antibiotics may be safely offered to neutropenic patients with fever who are at low risk for mortality.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.