• Arthur Zbrozek and Glenn Magee.
• CSL Behring, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: art.zbrozek@cslbehring.com.
• Clin Ther. 2015 Sep 1; 37 (9): 1966-74.

PurposeTrauma and complex cardiac surgery are associated with a high risk of bleeding complications. The difference in costs between patients who require bleeding control measures and those who do not is poorly understood. Our goal was to assess the cost of care and outcomes for patients in these settings.MethodsPatients >18 years of age, who were discharged between January 2010 and December 2012, were retrospectively identified in the Premier Hospital Database based on International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision codes. These patients were categorized as having received blood products ("bleeding patients") or not ("nonbleeding patients"). Patients with costs and length of stay (LOS) of zero were excluded. Differences in treatment costs and outcomes were assessed using univariate analysis and multivariate modeling.FindingsBleeding trauma patients (n = 8800) had a 150% higher total cost of care (P < 0.001; 146% after excluding costs of agents used for bleeding control, P < 0.001), an 81.3% longer hospital LOS (P < 0.001), and a 65.2% longer intensive care unit (ICU) LOS (P < 0.001) than nonbleeding patients (n = 53,727). Bleeding complex cardiac surgery patients (n = 82,832) had a 133.2% higher total cost of care (P < 0.001; 128.7% after excluding costs of agents used for bleeding control, P < 0.001), a 155.6% longer hospital LOS (P < 0.001), and an 89.3% longer ICU LOS (P < 0.001) than nonbleeding patients (n = 380,902).ImplicationsTrauma and cardiac surgery patients who experienced bleeding and received allogeneic blood product transfusions had significantly worse outcomes, including longer LOS, greater inpatient mortality, and higher costs of care (even when excluding costs of agents used for bleeding control) than those who did not.Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

40 keywords...

hide…