• Spine · Feb 2006

    Comparative Study

    Estimating SRS-22 quality of life measures with SF-36: application in idiopathic scoliosis.

    • Sue-Min Lai, Marc Asher, and Douglas Burton.
    • Department of Preventive Medicine & Public Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA. slai@kumc.edu
    • Spine. 2006 Feb 15; 31 (4): 473-8.

    Study DesignComparison of a generic- with a disorder-specific health-related quality of life (HRQL) questionnaire.ObjectivesTo determine the association between generic- and disorder-specific questionnaire domains of similar construct.Summary Of Background DataShort Form-36 (SF-36), a general HRQL questionnaire, has been widely used to evaluate patients with scoliosis and related spine deformity. How it relates to the disorder-specific Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire is currently unknown.MethodsSeventy-eight patients, operated at a mean age 14.5 years for idiopathic scoliosis with a mean largest Cobb of 60 degrees , completed both questionnaires at a mean of 9.25 years after surgery.ResultsThe predictability of the SRS-22 Mental Health domain is excellent using the SF-36 Mental Health domain, from which it was adapted (R2 = 0.81). The SRS-22 Pain domain predictability using the SF-36 Bodily Pain domain is also excellent (R2 = 0.79). The SRS-22 Function domain predictability using the SF-36 Physical Component Summary domain is good (R2 = 0.64). The SRS-22 Self-Image and Management Satisfaction/Dissatisfaction domains are poorly predicted by the SF-36 General Health and Physical Component Summary domains, respectively, R2 = 0.52 and 0.54.ConclusionSRS-22 Mental Health and Pain domain scores can be accurately calculated from correlating SF-36 domain scores. SRS-22 Function scores can be fairly well predicted from correlated SF-36 domain scores. Self-Image and Management Satisfaction/Dissatisfaction domain scores cannot be approximated from SF-36 domain scores.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.