• The Journal of urology · Feb 2009

    Comparative Study

    Radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: morbidity of laparoscopic versus open surgery.

    • Julien Guillotreau, Xavier Gamé, Marc Mouzin, Nicolas Doumerc, Richard Mallet, Federico Sallusto, Bernard Malavaud, and Pascal Rischmann.
    • Service d'Urologie, Andrologie et Transplantation Rénale, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France.
    • J. Urol. 2009 Feb 1; 181 (2): 554-9; discussion 559.

    PurposeWe compared the morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic vs open surgery in radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.Materials And MethodsThis prospective, nonrandomized study was conducted between January 2003 and July 2007 in 68 patients (7 women and 61 men) who underwent radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. A total of 38 cystectomies were performed laparoscopically and 30 by open surgery. Mean patient age was 68.0 +/- 9.0 years. Median preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists score was 2 (range 1 to 3) in both groups.ResultsIntraoperative blood loss and transfusion rate were significantly lower in the laparoscopic surgery group. Postoperatively the incidence of minor complications and mortality were also significantly lower. Postoperative opioid consumption was significantly less in the laparoscopic surgery group in amount and duration. Resumption of oral fluid and solid intake as well as return to normal bowel function were significantly more rapid in the laparoscopic surgery group, and mean hospital stay was significantly shorter. Mean patient followup was 30.5 +/- 17.2 months.ConclusionsLaparoscopic radical cystectomy for bladder cancer has a lower morbidity rate than cystectomy by open surgery. It allows more rapid resumption of oral fluid and solid intake as well as return to normal bowel function and shorter hospital stay.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…