• Neurol. Med. Chir. (Tokyo) · May 2003

    Long-term outcome for surgically treated cervical spondylotic radiculopathy and myelopathy.

    • Satoru Kadoya, Hideaki Iizuka, and Tsutomu Nakamura.
    • Department of Neurosurgery, Kanazawa Medical University, Ishikawa, Japan. kadoya-f@spacelan.ne.jp
    • Neurol. Med. Chir. (Tokyo). 2003 May 1; 43 (5): 228-40; discussion 241.

    AbstractLong-term follow-up results were examined to verify the efficacy of anterior osteophytectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy, in particular the outcome for patients with developmentally narrow cervical canals and patients with associated ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). One hundred thirty-nine patients who had undergone anterior osteophytectomy with interbody fusion between 1976 and 1990 were followed up for 1 to 22.5 years (mean 11.4 years). Overall results evaluated by the neurosurgical cervical spine scale scoring and grading showed significant improvement in both improvement score (2.7 +/- 2.3) and improvement rate (52.3 +/- 45.7%). Lower extremity motor function improved in 66.1% of patients, upper extremity motor function in 82.0%, and sensory/pain function in 70.5%. Improvement ranged from one to three grades. Severely affected patients showed good recovery. Outcome for patients with narrow cervical canals (41 patients, 29.5%) did not differ significantly from that for patients with normal canals (98, 70.5%). Patients with associated OPLL (32 patients, 23.0%) had approximately the same outcomes as those with only spondylosis (107, 77.0%). Fifteen patients (10.8%) underwent reoperation because of myelopathy due to disc degeneration adjacent to the fused level (11 patients) or OPLL (4 patients). Anterior osteophytectomy with interbody fusion can achieve good outcomes in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy, regardless of the size of the spinal canal and association with OPLL.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.