• R J Marcus and J P Thompson.
• University Department of Anaesthesia, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Infirmary Square,Leicester LE1 5WW, UK.
• Paediatr Anaesth. 2000 Jan 1; 10 (3): 273-7.

AbstractDespite recent recommendations that all children presenting for urgent or emergency surgery should be treated as though they have a full stomach, a local audit had shown a wide variation in technique used for anaesthesia in children after trauma. Therefore, a postal questionnaire was sent to 500 anaesthetists regarding their preferred anaesthetic technique for a 6-year-old child requiring manipulation of a forearm fracture. Four clinical situations were presented differing in the timing of surgery in relation to the injury, starvation times before injury and the administration of opioid analgesia. Rapid sequence induction and tracheal intubation was preferred by 83% of all anaesthetists for surgery on the day of injury if the child had eaten 2 h prior to injury and had received opioid analgesia, but the percentage was significantly lower in experienced anaesthetists (P < 0.05) compared with trainees, and was 34.5% overall if surgery was delayed until the following day. Only 19.3% would perform a rapid sequence induction for surgery on the day of injury if the child had not eaten for 6 h before the injury. We conclude that not all anaesthetists believe that rapid sequence induction is necessary for anaesthesia after forearm fractures, despite recent recommendations.

18 keywords...

hide…