• Rose Hatala, Ross J Scalese, Gary Cole, Maria Bacchus, Barry Kassen, and S Barry Issenberg.
• Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia (R.H., B.K.), Vancouver, BC, Canada. rhatala@mac.com
• Simul Healthc. 2009 Jan 1; 4 (1): 17-21.

IntroductionObjective outcome measures for use with simulator-based assessments of cardiac physical examination competence are lacking. The current study describes the development and validation of an approach to scoring performance using a cardiac findings checklist.MethodsA cardiac findings checklist was developed and implemented for use with a simulator-based assessment of cardiac physical examination competence at a Canadian national specialty examination in internal medicine. Candidate performance as measured using the checklist was compared with global ratings of clinical performance on the cardiac patient simulator and with overall examination performance.ResultsInterrater reliability for scoring the checklist ranged from 0.95 for scoring correct findings to 0.72 for scoring incorrect findings. A summary checklist score had a Pearson correlation of 0.60 with overall candidate performance on the simulator-based station.ConclusionUse of a cardiac findings checklist provides one objective measure of cardiac physical examination competence that may be used with simulator-based assessments.

12 keywords...

hide…