• Rodney M Ellis, Peter C Sprivulis, George A Jelinek, Neil D G Banham, Simon V Wood, Garry J Wilkes, Andrew Siegmund, and Brigit L Roberts.
• Department of Emergency Medicine, Fremantle Hospital.
• Emerg Med Australas. 2005 Apr 1; 17 (2): 152-6.

ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of intravenous versus intramuscular antivenom (AV) in the treatment of Red-back spider (RBS) envenoming.MethodsRandomized, double-dummy, double-blind, multicentre trial of patients with red-back spider envenoming requiring AV treatment recruited from five hospital EDs in Western Australia.ResultsThirty-five patients were recruited; two were excluded; 33 were available for initial analysis, but two who were unblinded after one ampoule of trial AV and given i.v. AV had limited data; 31 remained in the study and had more complete data. After AV, pain scores for both i.m. and i.v. groups improved rapidly. At 24 h, the i.v. group was better with a 55% absolute difference (76% vs. 21%; 95% CI 25-85% difference) in the proportion pain-free. There were no safety issues.ConclusionsRed-back spider antivenom was initially effective by both i.m. and i.v. routes. The study generates the hypothesis that at 24 h, significantly more patients are pain-free with i.v. administration. Definitive recommendations on the optimal route of administration of RBS AV await the results of further studies.

29 keywords...

hide…