-
Academic pediatrics · Nov 2015
Review Meta AnalysisShared Decision Making in Pediatrics: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
- Kirk D Wyatt, Betsy List, William B Brinkman, Gabriela Prutsky Lopez, Noor Asi, Patricia Erwin, Zhen Wang, Juan Pablo Domecq Garces, Victor M Montori, and Annie LeBlanc.
- Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine Residency Program, Mayo School of Graduate Medical Education, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn; Mayo Medical School, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn; Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
- Acad Pediatr. 2015 Nov 1; 15 (6): 573-83.
BackgroundLittle is known about the impact of interventions to support shared decision making (SDM) with pediatric patients.ObjectivesTo summarize the efficacy of SDM interventions in pediatrics on patient-centered outcomes.Data SourcesWe searched Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, Ovid Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, and Ovid PsycInfo from database inception to December 30, 2013, and performed an environmental scan.Study Eligibility CriteriaWe included interventions designed to engage pediatric patients, parents, or both in a medical decision, regardless of study design or reported outcomes.Study Appraisal And Synthesis MethodsWe reviewed all studies in duplicate for inclusion, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. Meta-analysis was performed on 3 outcomes: knowledge, decisional conflict, and satisfaction.ResultsSixty-one citations describing 54 interventions met eligibility criteria. Fifteen studies reported outcomes such that they were eligible for inclusion in meta-analysis. Heterogeneity across studies was high. Meta-analysis revealed SDM interventions significantly improved knowledge (standardized mean difference [SMD] 1.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.26 to 2.17, P = .01) and reduced decisional conflict (SMD -1.20, 95% CI -2.01 to -0.40, P = .003). Interventions showed a nonsignificant trend toward increased satisfaction (SMD 0.37, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.78, P = .08).LimitationsIncluded studies were heterogeneous in nature, including their conceptions of SDM.Conclusions And Implications Of Key FindingsA limited evidence base suggests that pediatric SDM interventions improve knowledge and decisional conflict, but their impact on other outcomes is unclear.Systematic Review Registration NumberPROSPERO CRD42013004761 (http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.asp?ID=CRD42013004761).Copyright © 2015 Academic Pediatric Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.