• Timothy P Plackett, Franklin Wright, Anthony J Baldea, Michael J Mosier, Casey Thomas, Fred A Luchette, Hieu H Ton-That, and Thomas J Esposito.
• Division of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care, & Burns, Department of Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, 2160 S. First Avenue, Maywood, IL 60153, USA. Electronic address: tplacke78@gmail.com.
• Am. J. Surg. 2016 Jan 1; 211 (1): 115-21.

BackgroundThe role of cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the evaluation of clinically unevaluable blunt trauma patients has been called into question by several recent studies.MethodsA PubMed search was performed for all studies comparing computed tomography and MRI in the assessment of the cervical spine in patients who cannot be evaluated clinically. The radiologic findings and clinical outcomes from each study were collated for analysis.ResultsData for 1,714 patients were available. All patients had a negative computed tomography scan and then underwent an MRI. There were 271 (15.8%) patients who had a previously undocumented finding on MRI with the majority (98.2%) being a ligamentous injury. Only 5 injuries (1.8%) resulted in surgical intervention.ConclusionsMRI identifies additional injuries; however, the vast majority are of minor clinical significance. Routine MRI after a negative computed tomography of the cervical spine is not supported by the current literature.Published by Elsevier Inc.

15 keywords...

hide…