• Am. J. Surg. · Aug 1995

    Clinical Trial

    Stump pressure, electroencephalographic changes, and the contralateral carotid artery: another look at selective shunting.

    • R N Harada, A J Comerota, G M Good, H A Hashemi, and J F Hulihan.
    • Department of Surgery, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
    • Am. J. Surg. 1995 Aug 1; 170 (2): 148-53.

    BackgroundSelective shunting during carotid endarterectomy is associated with the lowest operative stroke rate; therefore, patient selection for carotid shunting is critical. Electroencephalography (EEG) can detect ischemic brain cell dysfunction before irreversible injury. The carotid stump back pressure (CSP) has been inconsistent in determining the need for shunting, and contralateral carotid disease has had a variable impact. The purpose of this study was to evaluate CSP and operative EEG changes, and to determine the effect of contralateral carotid artery disease on determining the need for carotid shunting.MethodsIn 140 consecutive carotid procedures, operative EEG and CSP were monitored, and contralateral carotid disease was documented. The carotid stump pressure/mean arterial pressure index (CSP/MAP) was also calculated to determine if this was a better indicator of the need for shunting than the CSP alone.ResultsThere was a 58% incidence of EEG changes when the CSP was < or = 25 mm Hg, 32% with a CSP of 26 to 50 mm Hg, and 4% with a CSP > 50 mm Hg. There was a 43% incidence of EEG changes and lower CSP among patients with a contralateral occlusion, both of which were significantly different from patients with a patent contralateral carotid artery. Three patients with CSP > 50 mm Hg had EEG changes, but none had a contralateral occlusion. Two patients had permanent neurologic deficits, and 2 had transient deficits. Excluding combined procedures, operative stroke rate was 0.8%.ConclusionsA CSP of < 50 mm Hg achieved a sensitivity of 89% in patients who developed ischemic EEG changes during carotid clamping, and a pressure > 50 mm Hg had a negative predictive value of 96%. However, a CSP of < 50 mm Hg had a positive predictive value of only 36%. Neither the addition of the status of the contralateral carotid artery or the calculation of the CSP/MAP improved the sensitivity of the CSP in determining the need for shunting. Operative EEG monitoring remains the most sensitive guide to carotid shunting in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy under general anesthesia.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.