• Respir Physiol Neurobiol · Jan 2014

    Quantifying oscillatory ventilation during exercise in patients with heart failure.

    • Thomas P Olson and Bruce D Johnson.
    • Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, United States.
    • Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2014 Jan 1; 190: 25-32.

    BackgroundThis study examined the validity of a novel software application to quantify measures of periodic breathing rest (PB) and oscillatory ventilation during exercise (EOV) in heart failure patients (HF).MethodsEleven male HF patients (age=53±8yrs, ejection fraction=17±4, New York Heart Association Class=III(7)/IV(4)) were recruited. Ventilation and gas exchange were collected breath-by-breath. Amplitude and period of oscillations in ventilation (V˙E), tidal volume (VT), end-tidal carbon dioxide [Formula: see text] , and oxygen consumption [Formula: see text] were measured manually (MAN) and using novel software which included a peak detection algorithm (PK), sine wave fitting algorithm (SINE), and Fourier analysis (FOUR).ResultsDuring PB, there were no differences between MAN and PK for amplitude of V˙E, VT, [Formula: see text] , or [Formula: see text] . Similarly, there were no differences between MAN and SINE for amplitude of V˙E or VT although [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] were lower with SINE (p<0.05). In contrast, the PK demonstrated significantly shorter periods for V˙E, VT, [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] compared to MAN (p<0.05) whereas there were no differences in periods of oscillations between MAN and SINE or FOUR for all variables. During EOV, there were no differences between MAN and PK for amplitude of V˙E, VT, [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] . SINE demonstrated significantly lower amplitudes for VT, [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] (p<0.05) although V˙E was not different. PK demonstrated shorter periods for all variables (p<0.05) whereas there were no differences between MAN and SINE or FOUR for all variables.ConclusionThese data suggest PK consistently captures amplitudes while underestimating period. In contrast, SINE and FOUR consistently capture period although SINE underestimates amplitude. Thus, an optimal algorithm for the quantification of PB and/or EOV in patients with HF might combine multiple analysis methods.Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.