-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Improved junior paediatric prescribing skills after a short e-learning intervention: a randomised controlled trial.
- Morris Gordon, Madawa Chandratilake, and Paul Baker.
- Mary Seacole Building, MS 1.90, Frederick Road Campus, University of Salford, Greater Manchester, M6 6PU, UK. morris@betterprescribing.com
- Arch. Dis. Child. 2011 Dec 1; 96 (12): 1191-4.
ObjectiveMedication errors are common, with junior doctors accounting for the majority in acute healthcare. Paediatrics is uniquely challenging, but the evidence base to guide prescribing education is limited. The authors set out to develop a short, educationally sound, low cost e-learning resource for paediatric prescribing to improve junior doctors' prescribing skills and to evaluate its effectiveness.DesignA non-blinded randomised controlled trial.SettingNorth Western Deanery Foundation School, UK.Participants162 volunteer foundation (junior) doctors randomised into control (86) and intervention (76) groups.InterventionsOn study entry, participants were assessed on prescribing skill, prescribing habits and confidence. The intervention group completed the e-learning course designed for the study, which took 1-2 h. At 1 and 3 months after the intervention, both groups were assessed on similar prescribing assessments, habits and confidence.Main Outcome MeasuresTotal score (expressed as a percentage) on prescribing assessments, confidence and satisfaction scores.ResultsThere were no preintervention differences in prescribing assessments (67% vs 67%, p=0.56). Postintervention, the e-learning group scored significantly higher than the control group (63% vs 79%, p<0.0001). At 3 months, the e-learning group still scored significantly higher (69% vs 79%, p<0.0001), with improved confidence scores (p<0.0001).ConclusionsThis short e-learning resource significantly improved the paediatric prescribing skills of junior doctors. Outcomes were maintained at 3 months, suggesting the utility of low cost, low fidelity, educationally sound e-learning interventions. However, the direct impact on patient outcomes following this intervention has yet to be determined.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.