• C D Marley, D R Eitel, T E Anderson, A J Murn, and G A Patterson.
• Hanover General Hospital, PA 17331, USA.
• Acad Emerg Med. 1995 Jun 1; 2 (6): 503-7.

ObjectiveTo determine the ability of a prototype esophageal detection device (EDD) to identify esophageal misplacement of an endotracheal (ET) tube.MethodsA prospective, randomized, blinded study of detection of esophageal intubation was conducted using 51 elective surgical patients who met inclusion criteria. A squeeze-bulb aspirator that creates a negative pressure of -80 to -90 torr was used for detection of esophageal intubation. The bulb should reinflate rapidly if the tube is in the noncollapsible trachea, but should not reinflate if the tube is in the collapsible esophagus. Each patient was prepared for surgery in the usual manner. The anesthesiologist placed an ET tube into the trachea. An identical tube was advanced the same distance into the esophagus. The tubes were labeled "A" or "B" according to a computer-generated random number list. An evaluator, who was blinded to the placement of the tubes, assessed one tube with the EDD. For most patients, a second evaluator, who was blinded to both tube placement and the results of the first evaluator, assessed the other tube. During evaluation, the tube cuffs were deflated. After data collection, the esophageal tube was removed and surgery was completed.ResultsAll 45 esophageal tube placements were correctly identified. Thirty-five of the 40 ET tubes were correctly identified. Of the five ET tubes mislabeled, three were found in a mainstem bronchus. All had delayed bulb re-expansion.ConclusionThis prototype EDD is a useful method of identifying esophageal misplacement of an ET tube in anesthetized adult surgical patients.

15 keywords...

hide…