• Presse Med · Nov 2002

    Comparative Study

    [Waiting time and satisfaction of patients attending the emergency surgery unit of a university hospital center].

    • Marie Frank-Soltysiak and Charles Court.
    • Service de santé publique et d'épidémiologie, CHU de Bicêtre, 78, rue du Général Leclerc, 94275 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre. marie.frank@bct.ap-hop-paris.fr
    • Presse Med. 2002 Nov 9; 31 (36): 1690-5.

    ObjectiveThe emergency department of a university hospital centre receives 40,000 patients per year. A study was conducted in its surgical unit to assess the existing dysfunctions and to develop corrective measures.MethodThe method used was that of a prospective survey, based on two questionnaires: one on the waiting time, provided by each patient and by the different participants and one distributed to the consultants to measure their satisfaction with regard to the services rendered. The data were analysed using multivariate methods.ResultsThe questionnaire "waiting time" was completed for 812 patients. The median time spent in the emergency department was of 100 minutes, 47% of patients saw a physician less than 15 minutes after their arrival. The median medical time was of 45 minutes. The prescription of supplementary examinations significantly increased the time spent in the department (p < 0.01). Two hundred and twenty persons completed the "perception" questionnaire. Forty percent of patients considered that they had to wait too long, the time spent waiting for a medical examination was too long for 27.7%; 62.5% of the consultants were not informed of the foreseeable waiting time and the reasons for this delay. The participants were well cared for in 95.4% of cases, and well informed on the possible evolution of their lesions (88.4% of cases). The recommendations on leaving the department were clearly explained for 93.7%, 98.6% of the persons interviewed had been received kindly and 96.5% would return to the department if they needed to.ConclusionThis study revealed the insufficient information provided on the waiting time and the reasons for this delay. The availability of a nurse to welcome and assist the patients would improve these parameters. Posters should be displayed with information on the foreseeable waiting time. During a meeting to present the results of this study, all the staff were made aware of this problem.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.