-
Comparative Study
Outcomes studies of epiglottic and base of tongue prolapse in children.
- Robert F Yellon and Lawrence M Borland.
- Department of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. yellra@chp.edu
- Laryngoscope. 2008 Mar 1; 118 (3): 508-14.
ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to compare previously reported flexible fiberoptic laryngoscopy (FFL) findings of a grading system for children with epiglottic and base of tongue (EBT) prolapse with findings at follow-up FFL. Surgical outcomes and tracheotomy decannulation are also reported.Study Design: Retrospective medical record review.MethodsFourteen children with EBT prolapse had transnasal FFL in the supine position on at least two occasions. Findings were graded for initial versus most recent FFL. The previously published EBT prolapse grading system was reapplied. Mean age was 8.7 years at the last evaluation. Mean interval between initial and most recent FFL was 1.9 years.ResultsAt follow-up FFL, six (43%) children had the same grade of EBT prolapse, five (36%) had a milder grade, and three (21%) had a more severe grade. Five (36%) children were decannulated, and nine (64%) children remain tracheotomy dependant. Of nine children who had surgery, four (44%) were decannulated. Eight (89%) of nine children who were not decannulated have a history of developmental delay (P < .03). Twelve (86%) children had gastroesophageal reflux disease, and six (43%) had abnormal swallowing function.ConclusionsThe grading system was successfully reapplied to compare initial with follow-up findings in a cohort of children with EBT prolapse. Gastroesophageal reflux disease and swallowing dysfunction are common in this population. Judicious surgery may have some efficacy for EBT prolapse in selected patients. Many children with EBT prolapse still require tracheotomy, especially those with developmental delay.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.