• M G Guren, M T Eriksen, J N Wiig, E Carlsen, A Nesbakken, H K Sigurdsson, A Wibe, K M Tveit, and Norwegian Rectal Cancer Group.
• Department of Oncology, Ullevaal University Hospital, N-0407 Oslo, Norway. marianne.guren@ulleval.no
• Eur J Surg Oncol. 2005 Sep 1; 31 (7): 735-42.

AimsThe aims of the study were (1) to evaluate quality of life (QoL) and functional outcome in patients following anterior resection (AR) or abdominoperineal resection (APR) for rectal cancer, and (2) whether these outcomes were dependent on the level of anastomosis.MethodsPatients who were without recurrent or metastatic disease were identified from the Norwegian Rectal Cancer Registry. QoL was assessed by the EORTC questionnaires QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR38, and rectal function by a short questionnaire. Of 319 patients studied, 229 had undergone AR and 90 APR. The median age was 73 years, and the median time since surgery was 64 months.ResultsMean QoL scores for body image and male sexual problems were better following AR than APR (P<0.01), also in patients with a low (< or = 3 cm) anastomosis. Patients who had undergone AR had higher mean scores for constipation (P<0.001) and more often used anti-diarrhoeal medication (P=0.005), than patients who had undergone APR. Patients with a low anastomosis (< or = 3 cm) had more incontinence for gas and solid stools (P<0.05), and had more incontinence (P=0.006) compared with patients with higher anastomosis, but there was no difference in QoL. Subgroup analysis showed that irradiated patients (n=34) had worse rectal function in terms of frequency, urgency, and incontinence (P<0.01).ConclusionsAlthough rectal function was impaired in patients with low anastomosis, patients who had undergone AR had better QoL than patients who had undergone APR.

30 keywords...

hide…