• B König, U Erdmenger, R J Schröder, G Wienas, J Schaefer, M Pech, and U Stöckle.
• Zentrum für Muskuloskeletale Chirurgie, Klinik für Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie der CHARITE-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin. benjamin.koenig@charite.de
• Unfallchirurg. 2005 May 1; 108 (5): 378-85.

AbstractIntraoperative 3-D visualization using the Siremobil Iso C(3D) (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) has been approved for use in spine and long bone surgery since its recent clinical launch. In preparation for the clinical use of the Siremobil Iso C(3D) in pelvic surgery, the aim of this study was to grade the quality of visualization in comparison with the gold standard of computer tomography in four therapy relevant pelvic regions in eight human cadavers, including SI screws to exemplify implants in the dorsal pelvic ring. Besides the influence of the body mass index and the interference of metal artefacts, visualization quality was evaluated in different pelvic regions (sacroiliac joint, acetabulum, femoral neck and anterior pelvic ring) using a score with five subgroups, rating the applicability of Siremobil Iso C(3D) in pelvic surgery. The grading of image quality in comparable standard projections was performed independently by three surgeons and three radiologists.Visualization quality appeared sufficient for both intraoperative and postoperative control in cases with a known preoperative diagnosis. There was no influence of body mass index found in any of the eight cadavers. Implants positioned in the dorsal pelvic ring reduced visualization quality, but sufficient estimation of bony structures was still possible. For primary diagnostics, computer tomography remains a clearly superior option due to better image quality. For intraoperative control of the reduction and positioning of implants in pelvic surgery, however, the additional intraoperative use of Siremobil Iso C(3D) is considered to offer clear advantages over current 2-D C-arm visualization tools.

27 keywords...

hide…