• Lancet neurology · Mar 2013

    Multicenter Study

    The natural history of multiple system atrophy: a prospective European cohort study.

    • Gregor K Wenning, Felix Geser, Florian Krismer, Klaus Seppi, Susanne Duerr, Sylvia Boesch, Martin Köllensperger, Georg Goebel, Karl P Pfeiffer, Paolo Barone, Maria Teresa Pellecchia, Niall P Quinn, Vasiliki Koukouni, Clare J Fowler, Anette Schrag, Christopher J Mathias, Nir Giladi, Tanya Gurevich, Erik Dupont, Karen Ostergaard, Christer F Nilsson, Håkan Widner, Wolfgang Oertel, Karla Maria Eggert, Alberto Albanese, Francesca del Sorbo, Eduardo Tolosa, Adriana Cardozo, Günther Deuschl, Helge Hellriegel, Thomas Klockgether, Richard Dodel, Cristina Sampaio, Miguel Coelho, Ruth Djaldetti, Eldad Melamed, Thomas Gasser, Christoph Kamm, Giuseppe Meco, Carlo Colosimo, Olivier Rascol, Wassilios G Meissner, François Tison, Werner Poewe, and European Multiple System Atrophy Study Group.
    • Department of Neurology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria. gregor.wenning@i-med.ac.at
    • Lancet Neurol. 2013 Mar 1; 12 (3): 264-74.

    BackgroundMultiple system atrophy (MSA) is a fatal and still poorly understood degenerative movement disorder that is characterised by autonomic failure, cerebellar ataxia, and parkinsonism in various combinations. Here we present the final analysis of a prospective multicentre study by the European MSA Study Group to investigate the natural history of MSA.MethodsPatients with a clinical diagnosis of MSA were recruited and followed up clinically for 2 years. Vital status was ascertained 2 years after study completion. Disease progression was assessed using the unified MSA rating scale (UMSARS), a disease-specific questionnaire that enables the semiquantitative rating of autonomic and motor impairment in patients with MSA. Additional rating methods were applied to grade global disease severity, autonomic symptoms, and quality of life. Survival was calculated using a Kaplan-Meier analysis and predictors were identified in a Cox regression model. Group differences were analysed by parametric tests and non-parametric tests as appropriate. Sample size estimates were calculated using a paired two-group t test.Findings141 patients with moderately severe disease fulfilled the consensus criteria for MSA. Mean age at symptom onset was 56·2 (SD 8·4) years. Median survival from symptom onset as determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis was 9·8 years (95% CI 8·1-11·4). The parkinsonian variant of MSA (hazard ratio [HR] 2·08, 95% CI 1·09-3·97; p=0·026) and incomplete bladder emptying (HR 2·10, 1·02-4·30; p=0·044) predicted shorter survival. 24-month progression rates of UMSARS activities of daily living, motor examination, and total scores were 49% (9·4 [SD 5·9]), 74% (12·9 [8·5]), and 57% (21·9 [11·9]), respectively, relative to baseline scores. Autonomic symptom scores progressed throughout the follow-up. Shorter symptom duration at baseline (OR 0·68, 0·5-0·9; p=0·006) and absent levodopa response (OR 3·4, 1·1-10·2; p=0·03) predicted rapid UMSARS progression. Sample size estimation showed that an interventional trial with 258 patients (129 per group) would be able to detect a 30% effect size in 1-year UMSARS motor examination decline rates at 80% power.InterpretationOur prospective dataset provides new insights into the evolution of MSA based on a follow-up period that exceeds that of previous studies. It also represents a useful resource for patient counselling and planning of multicentre trials.Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…