-
- Vanessa Cartier, Cigdem Inan, Walter Zingg, Cecile Delhumeau, Bernard Walder, and Georges L Savoldelli.
- From the Division of Anaesthesiology (VCF, CI, CDC, BW, GLS); Infection Control Program, University Hospitals of Geneva and Geneva Faculty of Medicine (WZ); and UDREM (Unit for Development and Research in Medical Education), Geneva Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland (GLS).
- Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016 Aug 1; 33 (8): 568-74.
BackgroundMultimodal educational interventions have been shown to improve short-term competency in, and knowledge of central venous catheter (CVC) insertion.ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of simulation-based medical education training in improving short and long-term competency in, and knowledge of CVC insertion.DesignBefore and after intervention study.SettingUniversity Geneva Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland, between May 2008 and January 2012.ParticipantsResidents in anaesthesiology aware of the Seldinger technique for vascular puncture.InterventionParticipants attended a half-day course on CVC insertion. Learning objectives included work organization, aseptic technique and prevention of CVC complications. CVC insertion competency was tested pretraining, posttraining and then more than 2 years after training (sustainability phase).Main Outcome MeasuresThe primary study outcome was competency as measured by a global rating scale of technical skills, a hand hygiene compliance score and a checklist compliance score. Secondary outcome was knowledge as measured by a standardised pretraining and posttraining multiple-choice questionnaire. Statistical analyses were performed using paired Student's t test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test.ResultsThirty-seven residents were included; 18 were tested in the sustainability phase (on average 34 months after training). The average global rating of skills was 23.4 points (±SD 4.08) before training, 32.2 (±4.51) after training (P < 0.001 for comparison with pretraining scores) and 26.5 (±5.34) in the sustainability phase (P = 0.040 for comparison with pretraining scores). The average hand hygiene compliance score was 2.8 (±1.0) points before training, 5.0 (±1.04) after training (P < 0.001 for comparison with pretraining scores) and 3.7 (±1.75) in the sustainability phase (P = 0.038 for comparison with pretraining scores). The average checklist compliance was 14.9 points (±2.3) before training, 19.9 (±1.06) after training (P < 0.001 for comparison with pretraining scores) and 17.4 (±1.41) (P = 0.002 for comparison with pretraining scores). The percentage of correct answers in the multiple-choice questionnaire increased from 76.0% (±7.9) before training to 87.7% (±4.4) after training (P < 0.001).ConclusionSimulation-based medical education training was effective in improving short and long-term competency in, and knowledge of CVC insertion.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.