• Clin Nutr · Dec 2014

    Comparative Study

    The validity of Geriatric Nutrition Risk Index: simple tool for prediction of nutritional-related complication of hospitalized elderly patients. Comparison with Mini Nutritional Assessment.

    • Wafaa Mostafa Abd-El-Gawad, Rania Mohammed Abou-Hashem, Mohamed Omar El Maraghy, and Ghada Essam Amin.
    • Geriatrics and Gerontology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Abbassia, Cairo, Egypt. Electronic address: wafaager@hotmail.com.
    • Clin Nutr. 2014 Dec 1; 33 (6): 1108-16.

    Background & AimsThe Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) is a promising tool initially proposed to predict nutrition-related complications in sub-acute care setting. So, the main aim of this study was to validate the use of GNRI in hospitalized elderly patients by testing its ability to predict patients' outcome through the comparison with Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA).MethodsA prospective cohort study was conducted on 131 patients aged 60 and over admitted consecutively from October 2011 to September 2012 to the acute geriatrics medical ward in Ain Shams University hospitals, Cairo, Egypt. All patients were subjected to nutritional screening using GNRI and MNA and measurement of weight, body mass index (BMI), mid arm circumference (MAC), and calf circumference (CC), serum levels of total protein, albumin and prealbumin. Patients were followed for 6 months for the occurrence of major health complications as prolonged length of stay, infectious complications and mortality.ResultsMean age was 69.32 ± 8.17 years. Lower GNRI scores were statically significantly associated with worse MNA scores, lower weight, BMI, MAC, CC and albumin (P value < 0.001 for all). Only with GNRI, increasing odds ratio (OR) was seen with increasing risk of nutrition-related complication (from mild to moderate to severe). ORs (95%CI) for three month mortality were 1.63(0.0.27-10.00), 5.03(1.36-18.52), and 11.24(3.03-41.67), and OR (95%CI) for six month mortality were 1.64(0.403-6.62), 4.29 (1.45-12.66), and 5.71(1.87-17.54) respectively compared to patients with no risk and. By regression, both severe and moderate grade of GNRI were independent predictors of three and six month mortality (P value for three month: 0.002, 0.015; for six month: 0.002, 0.008 respectively) after adjustment of age, sex, and cancer rather than MNA.ConclusionsGNRI showed a higher prognostic value for describing and classification of nutritional status and nutritional-related complications in hospitalized elderly patients in addition to its simplicity.Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.